add task solution#1089
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
The test file has a critical mismatch: the test case for splitInteger(3, 4) expects [0, 1, 1, 1] (sorted ascending), but if the implementation produces [1, 1, 1, 0] (unsorted), this test will fail. Since the requirements explicitly state the output must be in ascending sort order, the implementation should produce sorted output. You need to either: 1) Ensure your splitInteger implementation returns results in ascending order (recommended), or 2) If the current behavior is intentional, update the test expectation to match. Additionally, consider adding an explicit length check with expect(result).toHaveLength(numberOfParts) and validating the max-min difference constraint for better test coverage.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
The request meets all required criteria and is ready for approval.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { | ||
| const result = splitInteger(4, 8); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => {}); | ||
| expect(result).toEqual([0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test expectation here is correct per the requirements (evenly distributed values with max-min difference <= 1). However, the current implementation returns [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4] instead of [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. The implementation needs to distribute the remainder value evenly across parts, not put it all in the last element.
2 participants
No description provided.